Eminent domain on Notably News

Eminent domain

Legal power of a government to take private property for public use

Follow Eminent domain on Notably News to receive short updates to your email — rarely!

We include updates on Bush v. Gore, Miranda warning, Brown v. Board of Education, Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Obergefell v. Hodges, Plessy v. Ferguson, Loving v. Virginia, Miranda v. Arizona, Lawrence v. Texas, Stop and identify statutes, Ernesto Miranda, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, Due Process Clause, Equal Protection Clause, Korematsu v. United States, Buck v. Bell ... and more.

2022	Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc. The United States Supreme Court decided the case Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., ruling that the Medicare Secondary Payer statute does not authorize disparate-impact liability. The Court held that the Marietta Plan's coverage terms for outpatient dialysis were lawful, as they applied uniformly to all covered individuals.
November 2020	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Judge Garaufis ruled that Kevin McAleenan was never properly named Acting Secretary, invalidating Chad Wolf's July memo and ordering DHS to resume the DACA program and provide relief to those adversely affected.
July 2020	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Acting Secretary of DHS, Chad Wolf, issued a memo stating the department should refuse all new DACA requests while evaluating the Supreme Court's ruling.
July 17 2020	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California District Court judge Paul W. Grimm issued orders requiring DHS to restore the DACA program to its pre-rescission status, including accepting new applicants.
June 18 2020	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court issues a 5-4 decision, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the majority opinion, finding the DHS's rescission of DACA 'arbitrary and capricious' under the Administrative Procedure Act.
November 2019	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Kevin McAleenan departed as acting Secretary of Homeland Security and was replaced by Chad Wolf, leading to the case being renamed Wolf v. Vidal.
November 12 2019	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, with observers noting Justices appeared to align along ideological lines.
June 2019	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court accepts the DACA case, combining it with two other related lawsuits: Trump v. NAACP and Wolf v. Vidal.
June 28 2019	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court granted certiorari, consolidating Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California with Trump v. NAACP and McAleenan v. Vidal.
May 2019	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California The Fourth Circuit ruled in Casa De Maryland v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., finding the DACA rescinding order was arbitrary and capricious, and vacated the order while remanding the case back to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.
November 8 2018	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Ninth Circuit rules to uphold the district court's injunction blocking DACA rescission, stating plaintiffs are likely to succeed in claiming the rescission is arbitrary and not in accordance with law.
May 15 2018	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Ninth Circuit hears oral arguments in the case.
March 25 2018	Brown v. Board of Education Linda Brown, the key plaintiff in the Brown v. Board of Education case, died at age 75.
February 26 2018	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court denies government's petition, ordering the Ninth Circuit to hear the appeal first, effectively preventing DACA termination on March 5, 2018.
January 18 2018	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Government files a petition for certiorari before judgement with the Supreme Court, asking to decide the case before the Ninth Circuit rules.
January 16 2018	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Government files an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
January 13 2018	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Government begins accepting DACA renewal applications using previous forms.
January 9 2018	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California U.S. District Judge William Alsup orders government to maintain DACA program while lawsuit is pending, ruling the agency's decision was based on a flawed legal premise.
December 20 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court unanimously lays out guidelines for document access.
December 8 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court grants application and temporarily halts district court's order to provide documents, with a 5-4 vote.
December 1 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Government files a petition for mandamus and application for stay with the Supreme Court to prevent district court from considering documents.
November 16 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Court of Appeals refuses, by a 2-1 vote, to stop the district court's order requiring government to provide records.
October 20 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Government files a petition for mandamus in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to prevent the district court from forcing document disclosure.
October 17 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California District Court orders the government to provide internal deliberative documents related to the DACA program rescission by October 27, 2017.
October 5 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Deadline for DACA recipients with status expiring on or before March 5, 2018, to apply for renewal of their DACA status.
September 8 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California University of California and President Janet Napolitano file a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to prevent the termination of the DACA program, arguing the rescission is unconstitutional and unlawful.
September 5 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the phase-out of the DACA program, indicating the Trump administration's intention to end the immigration protection for young undocumented immigrants.
June 2017	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rescinds the DACA program under President Donald Trump's administration.
2012	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California President Barack Obama establishes the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, allowing children brought to the United States without proper immigration authorization to defer deportation and receive work permits.

This contents of the box above is based on material from the Wikipedia articles Brown v. Board of Education, Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc. & Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, which are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Eminent domain

See Also

Oakland Raiders

European Convention on Human Rights

Renault