Ralph Lauren
American fashion designer and executive
Follow Ralph Lauren on Notably News to receive short updates to your email — rarely!
| June 2015 | Arvind Limited settled the lawsuit by paying Ralph Lauren Corporation $3.2 million in compensation. |
| June 2015 | Arvind Limited settled the lawsuit by paying Ralph Lauren Corporation $3.2 million in compensation. |
| 2014 | A judge ruled that USPA could be held in contempt for selling sunglasses with the double horsemen logo between 2009 and 2012, violating the previous legal injunction. USPA argued the injunction was limited to clothing and fragrances. |
| 2014 | A significant legal turning point occurred when a court dismissed Ralph Lauren's lawsuit against U.S. Polo Association, breaking the previous pattern of court rulings favoring Ralph Lauren. |
| 2014 | A judge ruled that USPA could be held in contempt for selling sunglasses with the double horsemen logo between 2009 and 2012, violating the previous legal injunction. USPA argued the injunction was limited to clothing and fragrances. |
| 2014 | A significant legal turning point occurred when a court dismissed Ralph Lauren's lawsuit against U.S. Polo Association, breaking the previous pattern of court rulings favoring Ralph Lauren. |
| 2013 | Polo Ralph Lauren filed a lawsuit against USPA and their textile firm, Arvind Limited, which manufactures and markets the USPA line in India. |
| 2013 | Polo Ralph Lauren filed a lawsuit against USPA and their textile firm, Arvind Limited, which manufactures and markets the USPA line in India. |
| March 2011 | Judge Sweet ruled in favor of Polo Ralph Lauren and issued a permanent injunction against USPA, rejecting USPA's request for a declaratory judgment to continue using their trademark. |
| March 2011 | Judge Sweet ruled in favor of Polo Ralph Lauren and issued a permanent injunction against USPA, rejecting USPA's request for a declaratory judgment to continue using their trademark. |
| November 2010 | USPA filed a lawsuit against Polo Ralph Lauren, claiming PRL was trying to monopolize a generic depiction of polo. Judge Robert W. Sweet ruled against USPA, noting that their double horsemen trademark with the word 'polo' could be classified as infringement. |
| November 2010 | USPA filed a lawsuit against Polo Ralph Lauren, claiming PRL was trying to monopolize a generic depiction of polo. Judge Robert W. Sweet ruled against USPA, noting that their double horsemen trademark with the word 'polo' could be classified as infringement. |
This contents of the box above is based on material from the Wikipedia article Polo Ralph Lauren vs U.S. Polo Association, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.